|
Author |
Title
|
Abstract
|
Manuscript
|
|
ADHIRAJ BHANDARI & MUKESH SINGH |
CHILD LABOUR RIGHTS: A CHILD IS MEANT TO LEARN AND NOT EARN, PAGE 1-13
|
|
|
|
AMAN CHACHAN & AKHAND PRATAP SINGH |
ARTICLE 131: THE EXCLUSIVE POWER OF THE SUPREME COURT,PAGE 14-20
|
|
|
|
ANCHIRPPA |
RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN-ISSUES IN THE DIGITAL AGE, PAGE 21-26
|
|
|
|
APURV VIKRAM SINGH |
MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY ACT, PAGE 27-33
|
|
|
|
ARYA SABHYATA RAY |
FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION IN INDIA: NEED FOR A SUI GENERIS LAW, PAGE 34-42
|
|
|
|
ASTHA GARG |
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO ADOPT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPETENCY OF PERSONS IN ADOPTION PROCESS, PAGE 43-52
|
|
|
|
BARASHA BORTHAKUR & SOURABH ROY |
THE SURROGACY (REGULATION) BILL, 2016: ANOTHER WAGON OF BAN OR A BOON?, PAGE 53-61
|
|
|
|
DIVYA ANN SAMUEL |
MISCARRIAGE UNDER IPC: REALISING THE NEED FOR CHANGE, PAGE 62-70
|
|
|
|
DR. MANPREET KAUR RAJPAL |
ECUMENICAL LEGAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE BOOMING INFERTILITY TREATMENT: OUTSOURCING PREGNANCY, PAGE 71-84
|
|
|
|
N.S.L.MUHANDIRAM |
CASE COMMENTARY ON AUSTRALIA V PORTUGAL (CASE CONCERNING EAST TIMOR) PAGE 85-91
|
|
|
|
NANDINI TOMAR & PRASHANT YADAV |
CREATION OF AGENCY, PAGE 92-99
|
|
|
|
NIRALI DEEPAK PAREKH |
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION, PAGE 100-106
|
|
|
|
RAJAT KUMAR |
JUSTICE KARNAN’S CASE – DID THE SUPREME COURT HAS GONE OFF ITS LIMITS ON THIS ONE?,PAGE 107-116
|
|
|
|
RHEA GHANSHANI |
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: THEORY OF DE LOCALIZATION, PAGE 117-126
|
|
|
|
SINDUJA.S |
ROLE OF LAW ON THE CRISES FACED BY THE ENVIRONMENT DUE TO TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH, PAGE 127-134
|
|
|
|
SIVARAJAN AARTHI |
JUSTICIABILITY OF SOCIAL RIGHTS, PAGE 135-145
|
|
|
|
SOUMIK PURKAYASTHA |
PERSONAL LAWS,TRIPLE TALAQ AND GRUNDNORM , PAGE 146-154
|
|
|
|
SUJEET KUMAR |
RIGHTS OF OVERSEAS CITIZENS OF INDIA: THE ATTITUDE OF INDIAN LEGISLATORS, PAGE 155-165
|
|
|
|
VISHAL SONI & MINALI GUPTA |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT ACT, 2013, PAGE 166-179
|
|
|